Friday, November 1, 2019

Review of "Infractions"

This book captured my attention not only because it is about NCAA rule breakers, but because I work in healthcare compliance, the work done by the people in the Infractions Committee, which is where the author had worked, is very similar in nature to my profession.  For both a sports book and a book on a profession, I thought it was excellent.  Here is my review of "Infractions"






Title/Author:

“Infractions: Rule Violations, Unethical Conduct and Enforcement in the NCAA” by Jerry Parkinson 

Tags:
Football (American), basketball, college, ethics

Publish date:
September 1, 2019

Length:
376 pages

Rating:
5 of 5 stars (outstanding

Review:
It is no secret that schools that compete in college sports have broken many rules, especially when it comes to recruiting, in order to gain a competitive edge.  The governing body of college sports, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) oversees compliance with the rules, investigates allegations of violations and deals out punishments to schools that are found guilty.  This book written by a former member of the NCAA's Committee on Infractions is an excellent look inside this segment of the organization.

Even though the NCAA has come under heavy criticism in the last few years, readers should not expect this book to be either a defense of the organization, nor is another one that bashes the NCAA because of unfair punishments, vague rules or any of the other reasons why NCAA-bashing has become popular. Instead Parkinson uses his experience in the rules enforcement area to explain to readers the inner workings of that committee through stories of past rule breakers.

Some of these incidents are well known, such as Southern Methodist University's (SMU) slush fund payments to players in the 1980's that resulted in the school receiving the only "death penalty" dished out by the NCAA. Two little known facts about this tawdry scheme and punishment for SMU are provided by Parkinson.  One, because SMU did not field a football team for two years (1987 and 1988) it is often reported the NCAA suspended the program for those two years.  Parkinson notes the penalty was only for one year and SMU voluntarily kept the program closed the second year believing they could not field a competitive team.  He also documents the school's basketball violations which are usually ignored in media reports, but were important in the decision to give such a harsh penalty because it made SMU have multiple major violations.

When discussing this case and the others, Parkinson writes in a balanced and fair manner. He states the facts of each case, he explains the cooperation or lack thereof by each school (an important factor in determining the result of the case) and what the Committee on Infractions did with the information provided. His inside look at the committee was also enlightening and will make a reader appreciate just how difficult the work can become.  For example, since the Committee does not have powers that some other investigative bodies have, such as the power to subpoena witnesses, it may be working without key evidence. 

While much of the reading is excellent, it can also be hard to digest. As one might imagine, the story of Penn State's assistant football coach who was found guilty of abusing children is still a difficult read, but even in cases like this, the material is enlightening as the reader will learn once again the difficulty of reviewing the infractions done by athletic programs, teams and coaches in order to win sporting contests.  This is a recommended read for not only college sports fans, but those who work in fields such as compliance and law for gaining an understanding of this profession in the world of athletics.

I wish to thank University of Nebraska Press for providing a copy of the book in exchange for an honest review.      

                                                    
Book Format Read:
Hardcover

Buying Links:

No comments:

Post a Comment